ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Developing Machine Vision in Tree-Fruit Applications-Fruit Count, Fruit Size and Branch Avoidance in Automated Harvesting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-Based Assessment of External Quality Traits in Chinese Bayberry (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Task NoisyViT for Enhanced Fruit and Vegetable Freshness Detection and Type Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design and Development of a Precision Spraying Control System for Orchards Based on Machine Vision Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A study on the detection of conductor quantity in cable cores based on YOLO-cable.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments in affordable depth imaging hardware and the use of 2D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in object detection and segmentation have accelerated the adoption of machine vision in a range of applications, with mainstream models often out-performing previous application-specific architectures. The need for the release of training and test datasets with any work reporting model development is emphasized to enable the re-evaluation of published work. An additional reporting need is the documentation of the performance of the re-training of a given model, quantifying the impact of stochastic processes in training. Three mango orchard applications were considered: the (i) fruit count, (ii) fruit size and (iii) branch avoidance in automated harvesting. All training and test datasets used in this work are available publicly. The mAP 'coefficient of variation' (Standard Deviation, SD, divided by mean of predictions using models of repeated trainings × 100) was approximately 0.2% for the fruit detection model and 1 and 2% for the fruit and branch segmentation models, respectively. A YOLOv8m model achieved a mAP50 of 99.3%, outperforming the previous benchmark, the purpose-designed 'MangoYOLO', for the application of the real-time detection of mango fruit on images of tree canopies using an edge computing device as a viable use case. YOLOv8 and v9 models outperformed the benchmark MaskR-CNN model in terms of their accuracy and inference time, achieving up to a 98.8% mAP50 on fruit predictions and 66.2% on branches in a leafy canopy. For fruit sizing, the accuracy of YOLOv8m-seg was like that achieved using Mask R-CNN, but the inference time was much shorter, again an enabler for the field adoption of this technology. A branch avoidance algorithm was proposed, where the implementation of this algorithm in real-time on an edge computing device was enabled by the short inference time of a YOLOv8-seg model for branches and fruit. This capability contributes to the development of automated fruit harvesting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.