Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275502›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancing mHealth Research in Low-Resource Settings: Young Women's Insights and Implementation Challenges with Wearable Smartwatch Devices in Uganda.

Monica H Swahn, Kevin B Gittner, Matthew J Lyons, Karen Nielsen, Kate Mobley, Rachel Culbreth, Jane Palmier, Natalie E Johnson, Michael Matte, Anna Nabulya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Monica H SwahnWellstar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-3885
Kevin B GittnerWellstar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7558-3317
Matthew J LyonsWellstar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.
Karen NielsenSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Kate MobleyCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8487-0059
Rachel CulbrethAmerican College of Medical Toxicology, Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA.
Jane PalmierWellstar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.
Natalie E JohnsonDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8379-1183
Michael MatteUganda Youth Development Link, Kampala P.O. Box 12659, Uganda.
Anna NabulyaUganda Youth Development Link, Kampala P.O. Box 12659, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-8731

Funding

TOPOWA Study: Social Drivers of Mental Illness among AGYW in Slums.R01MH128930 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Monica H Swahn · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
NIH HHS 1R01MH128930-03S1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many regions globally, including low-resource settings, there is a growing trend towards using mHealth technology, such as wearable sensors, to enhance health behaviors and outcomes. However, adoption of such devices in research conducted in low-resource settings lags behind use in high-resource areas. Moreover, there is a scarcity of research that specifically examines the user experience, readiness for and challenges of integrating wearable sensors into health research and community interventions in low-resource settings specifically. This study summarizes the reactions and experiences of young women (N = 57), ages 18 to 24 years, living in poverty in Kampala, Uganda, who wore Garmin vívoactive 3 smartwatches for five days for a research project. Data collected from the Garmins included participant location, sleep, and heart rate. Through six focus group discussions, we gathered insights about the participants' experiences and perceptions of the wearable devices. Overall, the wearable devices were met with great interest and enthusiasm by participants. The findings were organized across 10 domains to highlight reactions and experiences pertaining to device settings, challenges encountered with the device, reports of discomfort/comfort, satisfaction, changes in daily activities, changes to sleep, speculative device usage, community reactions, community dynamics and curiosity, and general device comfort. The study sheds light on the introduction of new technology in a low-resource setting and also on the complex interplay between technology and culture in Kampala's slums. We also learned some insights into how wearable devices and perceptions may influence behaviors and social dynamics. These practical insights are shared to benefit future research and applications by health practitioners and clinicians to advance and enhance the implementation and effectiveness of wearable devices in similar contexts and populations. These insights and user experiences, if incorporated, may enhance device acceptance and data quality for those conducting research in similar settings or seeking to address population-specific needs and health issues.

Indexed as

TelemedicineWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansSleepUgandaYoung AdultAfricadigital healthlow- and middle-income countriesmHealth technologyUgandawearable deviceswearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39275502
PMCPMC11398240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.