ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
AI-Based Prediction of Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Milling Performance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic neural operator framework for multi-objective optimization of Ti-6Al-4 V metal matrix composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study aims to evaluate the performance of the ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (USVAM) process when machining two different materials with high deviations in mechanical properties, specifically 7075 aluminium alloy and Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Additionally, this study seeks to develop an AI-based model to predict the process performance based on experimental data for the different workpiece characteristics. In this regard, an ultrasonic vibratory setup was designed to provide vibration oscillations at 28 kHz frequency and 8 µm amplitude in the cutting feed direction for the two characterised materials of 7075 aluminium alloy (150 BHN) and Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy (350 BHN) workpieces. A series of slotting experiments were conducted using both conventional milling (CM) and USVAM techniques. The axial cutting force and machined slot surface roughness were evaluated for each method. Subsequently, Support Vector Regression (SVR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were built, tested and compared. AI-based models were developed to analyse the experimental results and predict the process performance for both workpieces. The experiments demonstrated a significant reduction in cutting force by up to 30% and an improvement in surface roughness by approximately four times when using USVAM compared to CM for both materials. Validated by the experimental findings, the ANN model accurately and better predicted the performance metrics with RMSE = 0.11 µm and 0.12 N for Al surface roughness and cutting force. Regarding Ti, surface roughness and cutting force were predicted with RMSE of 0.12 µm and 0.14 N, respectively. The results indicate that USVAM significantly enhances milling performance in terms of a reduced cutting force and improved surface roughness for both 7075 aluminium alloy and Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. The ANN model proved to be an effective tool for predicting the outcomes of the USVAM process, offering valuable insights for optimising milling operations across different materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.