Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275228›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Nutrient Analysis of Raw and Cooked USDA Prime Beef Cuts.

Emma G Mortensen, Hannah F Fuerniss, Jerrad F Legako, Leslie D Thompson, Dale R Woerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Application of Omics in Donkey Meat Research: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma G MortensenDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79406, USA.
Hannah F FuernissTexas Beef Council, Austin, TX 78726, USA.
Jerrad F LegakoDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79406, USA.
Leslie D ThompsonDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79406, USA.
Dale R WoernerDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79406, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2063-4807

Funding

National Cattlemen's Beef Association N/AThe Beef Checkoff N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient composition data that accurately represent available beef products are critical to understanding beef's role in healthy dietary patterns. The quality of beef products has changed over the past several decades, and updated nutrient data are warranted as USDA Prime beef cuts become more available. In an effort to provide a complete nutrient profile for frequently purchased USDA Prime beef cuts, five USDA Prime cuts; strip loin steak, tenderloin steak, ribeye steak, top sirloin steak, and rib roast were collected from retail stores in six geographical locations over three collections for macro- and micronutrient analysis in both the raw and cooked state. The separable lean portion of all analyzed USDA Prime cuts qualified as a good or excellent source, providing 10-19% or at least 20% of the daily value, respectively, for protein, niacin, vitamin B12, selenium, phosphorus, and zinc per FDA labeling claim standards. There was not a significant difference in cholesterol content between any of the cuts, raw or cooked (

Indexed as

CookingNutritive ValueRed MeatUnited States Department of AgricultureAnimalsCattleUnited Statesbeefbeef qualityfatty acidsnutrientsnutritionprime beef

Identifiers

PMID39275228
PMCPMC11397233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.