Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275159›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2024

Effectiveness of Zinc Supplementation for Sepsis Treatment: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

Muneyoshi Kim, Takaaki Maruhashi, Yasushi Asari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muneyoshi KimDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine; 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan.
Takaaki MaruhashiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine; 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan.
Yasushi AsariDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine; 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9413-5982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZinc plays an important role in sepsis; however, the effectiveness of zinc supplementation and the appropriate dose remain unclear. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of zinc supplementation and the appropriate dose in patients with sepsis.

methodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included 247 patients with sepsis from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2023 who were receiving ventilatory management. The patients were divided into three groups according to the zinc supplementation dose: <15 mg, 15-50 mg, and ≥50 mg.

resultsThe <15 mg, 15-50 mg, and ≥50 mg groups had 28 (19%), six (21%), and 16 deaths (22%) at discharge, with no statistically significant difference (

conclusionsZinc supplementation did not reduce the mortality rate or length of ICU stay or contribute to an increased serum zinc concentration. High-dose zinc supplementation may not be effective during acute sepsis.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsIntensive Care UnitsLength of StaySepsisZincAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeZincintensive carenutrition therapysepsistrace elementszinc

Identifiers

PMID39275159
PMCPMC11397321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.