Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39274936›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Beyond Transduction: Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Cell Penetrating Peptides.

Jack Lopuszynski, Jingyu Wang, Maliha Zahid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack LopuszynskiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guggenheim Gu 9-01B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jingyu WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guggenheim Gu 9-01B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Maliha ZahidDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guggenheim Gu 9-01B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2986-9557

Funding

Targeting Underlying Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Develop Novel Therapies for Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseR01HL153407 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZAHID, MALIHA · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153407NIH HHS R01HL153407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the bottlenecks to bringing new therapies to the clinic has been a lack of vectors for delivering novel therapeutics in a targeted manner. Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) have received a lot of attention and have been the subject of numerous developments since their identification nearly three decades ago. Known for their transduction abilities, they have generally been considered inert vectors. In this review, we present a schema for their classification, highlight what is known about their mechanism of transduction, and outline the existing literature as well as our own experience, vis a vis the intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties that certain CPPs exhibit. Given the inflammatory responses associated with viral vectors, CPPs represent a viable alternative to such vectors; furthermore, the anti-inflammatory properties of CPPs, mostly through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway, are encouraging. Much more work in relevant animal models, toxicity studies in large animal models, and ultimately human trials are needed before their potential is fully realized.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsCell-Penetrating PeptidesAnimalsHumansInflammationNF-kappa BSignal TransductionAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCell-Penetrating PeptidesNF-kappa Bcell penetrating peptidesinflammationNF-κBprotein transduction domains

Identifiers

PMID39274936
PMCPMC11397606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.