Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39274686›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Dentin Bonding Durability of Four Different Recently Introduced Self-Etch Adhesives.

Sayaka Kitahara, Shojiro Shimizu, Tomohiro Takagaki, Masanao Inokoshi, Ahmed Abdou, Michael F Burrow, Toru Nikaido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effective 10-MDP Bonding to Saliva-Contaminated Dentin.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Evolution of Dental Resin Adhesives-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sayaka KitaharaDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho, Gifu 501-0296, Japan.
Shojiro ShimizuDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho, Gifu 501-0296, Japan.
Tomohiro TakagakiDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho, Gifu 501-0296, Japan.
Masanao InokoshiDepartment of Oral Devices and Materials, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8833-3907
Ahmed AbdouDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4830-4594
Michael F BurrowFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Toru NikaidoDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho, Gifu 501-0296, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science No. 20K09983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the bonding durability of four different self-etch adhesives to dentin after 24 h and thermal cycling (TC) and to measure the degree of polymerization conversion (DC) in situ. Two-step self-etch adhesives, Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2, Kuraray Noritake Dental) and G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), and one-step self-etch adhesives, Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU, 3M ESPE) and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (UBQ, Kuraray Noritake Dental), were used. The labial surfaces of bovine teeth were ground to create flat dentin surfaces. The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. After resin composite buildup and 24 h water storage, the specimens were sectioned into beams and all groups were subjected to thermal stress for 0, 10,000 (10k), or 20,000 (20k) cycles followed by micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. In situ DC was investigated with a laser Raman microscope. The µTBS data were statistically analyzed and subjected to a Weibull analysis. The different groups were compared at the characteristic strength (63.2% probability of failure) (α = 0.05). Two-Way ANOVA was used to show the effect of different adhesives and thermal cycling on the mean DC% followed by Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test. G2B/TC10k resulted in a significant increase in the µTBS compared to TC0. SBU/TC20k showed significantly higher µTBS compared to TC0. For comparison between different tested adhesives, SBU showed a significantly lower µTBS compared to G2B after TC10k. G2B and SBU showed a greater number of adhesive failures after TC. Mean DC% was different for each adhesive. The newly developed MDP- and HEMA-free 2-SEA showed similar bonding performance with the gold-standard 2-SEA. However, there is still room for further improvement in terms of SEAs.

Indexed as

degree of conversionmicro-tensile bond strengthself-etch adhesivethermal cycleuniversal bond

Identifiers

PMID39274686
PMCPMC11396391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.