ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Biocompatibility Evaluation of an Artificial Metallic Bone with Lattice Structure for Reconstruction of Bone Defect.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mandibular reconstruction for large bone defects is performed with consideration of patients' specific morphology and sufficient strength. Metal additive manufacturing techniques have been used to develop biomaterials for mandibular reconstruction. Titanium artificial mandibles with a lattice structure have been proposed, and the optimal conditions for their strength to withstand mechanical stress around the mandible have been reported. This study investigated the biocompatibility of a titanium artificial bone with a lattice structure fabricated under optimal conditions. The samples were fabricated using metal additive manufacturing. Body diagonals with nodes (BDN) were selected as suitable lattice structures. Dode medium (DM) was selected for comparison. The samples were implanted into rabbit tibial defects and resected with the surrounding bone at two and four weeks. Specimens were evaluated radiographically, histologically, and histomorphometrically. Radiopacity in each lattice structure was observed at two and four weeks. Histological evaluation showed trabecular bone-like tissue inside the BDN compared to the DM at four weeks. No significant differences were noted in the bone volume inside the structures. This study demonstrated the in vivo compatibility of artificial metallic bones with a BDN structure under mechanical stress conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.