Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39274630›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Generation of Customized Bone Implants from CT Scans Using FEA and AM.

Claude Wolf, Deborah Juchem, Anna Koster, Wilfrid Pilloy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claude WolfDepartment of Engineering, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Deborah JuchemDepartment of Engineering, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Anna KosterDepartment of Engineering, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Wilfrid PilloyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sefako Makgatho University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa.

Funding

FEDER Fonds Européens Luxembourg UDAM Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) allows the creation of customized designs for various medical devices, such as implants, casts, and splints. Amongst other AM technologies, fused filament fabrication (FFF) facilitates the production of intricate geometries that are often unattainable through conventional methods like subtractive manufacturing. This study aimed to develop a methodology for substituting a pathological talus bone with a personalized one created using additive manufacturing. The process involved generating a numerical parametric solid model of the specific anatomical region using computed tomography (CT) scans of the corresponding healthy organ from the patient. The healthy talus served as a mirrored template to replace the defective one. Structural simulation of the model through finite element analysis (FEA) helped compare and select different materials to identify the most suitable one for the replacement bone. The implant was then produced using FFF technology. The developed procedure yielded commendable results. The models maintained high geometric accuracy, while significantly reducing the computational time. PEEK emerged as the optimal material for bone replacement among the considered options and several specimens of talus were successfully printed.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbiomaterialsCT segmentationFEAfused filament fabricationimplantpatient’s specificsimulation

Identifiers

PMID39274630
PMCPMC11396358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.