Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39274592›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Zirconia Dental Implant Designs and Surface Modifications: A Narrative Review.

Michał Ciszyński, Bartosz Chwaliszewski, Wojciech Simka, Marzena Dominiak, Tomasz Gedrange, Jakub Hadzik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michał CiszyńskiDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-8479
Bartosz ChwaliszewskiDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Wojciech SimkaFaculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2648-5523
Marzena DominiakDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-0549
Tomasz GedrangeDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Jakub HadzikDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2353-3198

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University SUBZ.B040.24.008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium currently has a well-established position as the gold standard for manufacturing dental implants; however, it is not free of flaws. Mentions of possible soft-tissue discoloration, corrosion, and possible allergic reactions have led to the development of zirconia dental implants. Various techniques for the surface modification of titanium have been applied to increase titanium implants' ability to osseointegrate. Similarly, to achieve the best possible results, zirconia dental implants have also had their surface modified to promote proper healing and satisfactory long-term results. Despite zirconium oxide being a ceramic material, not simply a metal, there have been mentions of it being susceptible to corrosion too. In this article, we aim to review the literature available on zirconia implants, the available techniques for the surface modification of zirconia, and the effects of these techniques on zirconia's biological properties. Zirconia's biocompatibility and ability to osseointegrate appears unquestionably good. Despite some of its mechanical properties being, factually, inferior to those of titanium, the benefits seem to outweigh the drawbacks. Zirconia implants show very good success rates in clinical research. This is partially due to available methods of surface treatment, including nanotopography alterations, which allow for improved wettability, bone-to-implant contact, and osteointegration in general.

Indexed as

corrosiondentalimplantsmodificationssurfacezirconia

Identifiers

PMID39274592
PMCPMC11396535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.