ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Adsorption Technology for PFAS Removal in Water: Comparison between Novel Carbonaceous Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implications of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals for Human Health and Effective Methods for Prevention and Reduction.Toxics · 2026Review
- Pinewood Biochar as an Affordable Adsorbent for Short- and Medium-Chain PFAS Removal from Contaminated Water.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Designing biochars for improved sorptive removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PFASs are a variety of ecologically persistent compounds of anthropogenic origin loosely included in many industrial products. In these, the carbon chain can be fully (perfluoroalkyl substances) or partially (polyfluoroalkyl substances) fluorinated. Their ubiquitous presence in many environmental compartments over the years and their long-lasting nature have given rise to concerns about the possible adverse effects of PFASs on ecosystems and human health. Among a number of remediation technologies, adsorption has been demonstrated to be a manageable and cost-effective method for the removal of PFASs in aqueous media. This study tested two novel and eco-friendly adsorbents (pinewood and date seeds biochar) on six different PFASs (PFOS, GenX, PFHxA, PFOA, PFDA, and PFTeDA). Batch sorption tests (24 h) were carried out to evaluate the removal efficiency of each PFAS substance in relation to the two biochars. All samples of liquid phase were analyzed by a developed and then a well-established method: (i) pre-treatment (centrifugation and filtration) and (ii) determination by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The results evidenced a comparable adsorption capacity in both materials but greater in the long-chain PFASs. Such findings may lead to a promising path towards the use of waste-origin materials in the PFAS remediation field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.