The Role of Global Longitudinal Strain in the Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Patients with Chronic Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Mitral Regurgitation in Contemporary Practice: From Diagnosis to Management.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
   Review
2. Persistent Shift in Principal Strain Angles and Postsurgical Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Primary Mitral Regurgitation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
   Article
3. Speckle-tracking Echocardiography as an Early Predictor for LV Dysfunction in Rheumatic Mitral Regurgitation.Journal of cardiovascular echography
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as