Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39274348›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Two Cases of Symptomatic Tailgut Cysts.

Jan Wojciechowski, Tomasz Skołozdrzy, Piotr Wojtasik, Maciej Romanowski

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan WojciechowskiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-4171-0096
Tomasz SkołozdrzyDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-8117-6971
Piotr WojtasikDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Maciej RomanowskiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tailgut cysts are rare lesions which are found in the rectorectal space. They develop in the final section of the intestine from which the rectum and anus extend and vary from being asymptomatic to symptomatic due to pressure on organs or nerves. Tailgut cysts are more common in females, usually between 30 and 60 years of age. They are thought to be benign, with variable malignancy risks. Surgical excision followed by histological examination is the gold standard of treatment, but access and approach to tailgut cysts depend on the location and morphology of the lesion. We present two symptomatic cases of this very rare pathology. In both cases, the cyst and coccyx bone were successfully excised using different approaches. The first patient was a 40-year-old woman with a large cyst which caused morning tenesmus, urinary outflow disorders and painful ovulation. Due to the cyst size, laparotomy was performed, and a combined approach was used. The second patient is a 36-year-old woman with co-existing endometriosis and a cyst causing pain in the sacral spine, constipation and tenesmus. The tumor was excised using a Kraske approach, and due to the infiltration of the coccyx bone it was removed using an osteotome. In this patient, perforation of the cyst was also observed. Both patients completed follow-ups involving regular surgical check-ups and MRI scans. Descriptions of different symptoms and surgical approaches make our study an important source of knowledge for diagnosing and treating these very rare tumors.

Indexed as

malignancy riskrectorectal cystictailgut cyst

Identifiers

PMID39274348
PMCPMC11396497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.