ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Overview of the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional differences in foveal avascular zone morphology in cynomolgus macaques using a normative OCTA database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AAV-based gene therapies for neovascular AMD.Gene therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence based assessment of treatment response in wet age related macular degeneration using paired OCT angiography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Real-World 6-Month Treatment Outcomes of Faricimab in Turkey: The FARTURK Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Dynamic changes in aqueous humor cytokines and OCTA parameters during aflibercept loading in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving OCTA Visualization of Macular Neovascularization via a Grayscale Inversion Method.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this review is to present and discuss the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). OCTA is a non-invasive imaging procedure that gives a detailed indirect view of physiological and pathological vessels in the retina and choroid membrane. Compared with dye-based imaging, OCTA provides a segmented presentation of the individual vascular layers and plexuses, thus enabling previously unattainable differentiation and classification of pathological vascular changes within or underneath the retina. In particular, OCTA facilitates early detection of exudative macular neovascularizations (MNV) so that treatment with anti-VEGF medication can be initiated. Moreover, in the context of both screening and therapy monitoring, it is hoped that OCTA can provide more detailed data to enable greater personalization of treatment and follow-up. The image quality of OCTA is, however, susceptible to artifacts, and validation of the results by studies is required. Recent developments have shown constant improvement both in the algorithms for image calculation and avoidance of artifacts and in image quality, so the scope of OCTA will certainly expand with time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.