ArticlePolymers2024
Influence of Infill Patterns on the Shape Memory Effect of Cold-Programmed Additively Manufactured PLA.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In four-dimensional additive manufacturing (4DAM), specific external stimuli are applied in conjunction with additive manufacturing technologies. This combination allows the development of tailored stimuli-responsive properties in various materials, structures, or components. For shape-changing functionalities, the programming step plays a crucial role in recovery after exposure to a stimulus. Furthermore, precise tuning of the 4DAM process parameters is essential to achieve shape-change specifications. Within this context, this study investigated how the structural arrangement of infill patterns (criss-cross and concentric) affects the shape memory effect (SME) of compression cold-programmed PLA under a thermal stimulus. The stress-strain curves reveal a higher yield stress for the criss-cross infill pattern. Interestingly, the shape recovery ratio shows a similar trend across both patterns at different displacements with shallower slopes compared to a higher shape fixity ratio. This suggests that the infill pattern primarily affects the mechanical strength (yield stress) and not the recovery. Finally, the recovery force increases proportionally with displacement. These findings suggest a consistent SME under the explored interval (15-45% compression) despite the infill pattern; however, the variations in the mechanical properties shown by the stress-strain curves appear more pronounced, particularly the yield stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.