Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273997›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Metabolomics Analysis of Phenolic Composition and Content in Five Pear Cultivars Leaves.

Huijun Jiao, Qiuzhu Guan, Ran Dong, Kun Ran, Hongwei Wang, Xiaochang Dong, Shuwei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Active Components ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huijun JiaoState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.
Qiuzhu GuanState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.
Ran DongState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.
Kun RanState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.ORCID 0009-0007-8228-9571
Hongwei WangState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.
Xiaochang DongState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2111-2955
Shuwei WeiState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Shandong Institute of Pomology, Longtan Road No. 66, Taian 271000, China.

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China CXGC2022F21China Agriculture Research System CARS-28-37National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land GYJ2023004Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China ZR2023MC061, ZR2021MC177, ZR2023MC108Youth Foundation of Shandong Institute of Pomology, China GSS2022QN11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenolic compounds are the predominant chemical constituents in the secondary metabolites of plants and are commonly found in pears. In this study, we focused on the analysis of the phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of leaves from five pear cultivars (Cuiguan, Chaohong, Kuerle, Nanguoli, and Yali) and tea leaves (Fudingdabai as the control) using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. The results indicated significant differences in the amount and composition of phenolic metabolites between tea and pear leaves, as well as among the five pear varieties. Only approximately one-third of the metabolites exhibited higher levels in pear leaves compared to that in tea leaves. The total phenol content in the Yali cultivar was higher than that in the other pear cultivars. Furthermore, specific phenolic metabolites with high expression were identified in the leaves of different groups. The levels of delphinidin 3-glucoside, aesculin, prunin, cosmosiin, quercetin 3-galactoside, isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside, nicotiflorin, narcissin, chlorogenic acid, and cryptochlorogenic acid were relatively high among the five pear cultivars. (-)-Gallocatechin gallate, 6-methylcoumarin, aesculetin, hesperidin, kaempferol, and caftaric acid were identified as specific metabolic substances unique to each type of pear leaf. Most of the differential metabolites showed positive correlations and were primarily enriched in the flavonoid biosynthesis, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways. DPPH (1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) analysis indicated that the Yali cultivar exhibited the highest antioxidant activity compared to other varieties. This systematic analysis of the differences in phenolic metabolite composition and antioxidant activity between pear and tea leaves provides a theoretical foundation for the development and utilization of pear leaf resources.

Indexed as

antioxidant activityDPPHmetabolomicspearphenolic compound

Identifiers

PMID39273997
PMCPMC11396794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.