Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273814›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).

Emilie N Miley, Madeline P Casanova, Michael A Pickering, Scott W Cheatham, Lindsay W Larkins, Adam C Cady, Russell T Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emilie N MileyInstitute of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Department of Health, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9286-2115
Madeline P CasanovaWWAMI Medical Education Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-3232
Michael A PickeringDepartment of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Scott W CheathamDepartment of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Lindsay W LarkinsDepartment of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-5355
Adam C CadyKaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, CA 91367, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3811-1729
Russell T BakerWWAMI Medical Education Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3352-9632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

confirmatory factor analysislatent growth-curve modelingmulti-group invariance testingtotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39273814
PMCPMC11395684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.