ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development and Validation of the "Program to Promote Positive Nursing Practice Environments": Modified Delphi Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting Positive Nursing Practice Environments: Outcomes of a Randomized Trial in Primary Care.Journal of nursing management · 2026Trial
- Care Provider Perceptions of Person-Centeredness in Geriatric Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Development of a Core Set of Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes in Intensive Care Units: A Delphi Consensus Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- AI-driven virtual standardized patients combined with scenario-based simulation in anesthesiology training: a randomized pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Nurses' work value patterns and their relationship with burnout: a cross-sectional study based on latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive nursing practice environments benefit clients, professionals, and institutions, specifically for professionals, by improving professional visibility, recognition, retention intentions, well-being, commitment, job satisfaction, and reducing stress and burnout. Clients experience better quality care, safety, satisfaction, engagement, and fewer care omissions. Institutions favored reduced absenteeism and turnover, improved efficiency, lower costs, and better health outcomes. This study aimed to document the development of the "Program to Promote Positive Nursing Practice Environments" and analyze expert perceptions to reach a consensus. Using a two-round modified online Delphi technique with 22 experts, we examined perspectives on the program's goals, duration, organization, and content. Initial feedback showed agreement on the program's duration but mixed opinions on the number and length of sessions due to concerns about participant workload and fatigue. Adjustments led to a strong consensus and positive feedback on the program's coverage of essential nursing practice environment constructs. The program includes sessions on client, professional, and institutional dynamics, focusing on key attributes and outcomes for fostering positive nursing environments. By equipping nurses with knowledge and skills, the program aims to enhance work environments effectively. These findings provide a substantial advancement in the field, offering a robust framework for future initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.