Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273754›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Gaps in the Global Regulatory Frameworks for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Healthcare Services Sector and Key Recommendations.

Kavitha Palaniappan, Elaine Yan Ting Lin, Silke Vogel, John C W Lim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. DisarmingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kavitha PalaniappanCentre of Regulatory Excellence, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Elaine Yan Ting LinCentre of Regulatory Excellence, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Silke VogelCentre of Regulatory Excellence, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
John C W LimCentre of Regulatory Excellence, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4286-4937

Funding

Ministry of Health, Singapore MH 114:63/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has shown remarkable potential to revolutionise healthcare by enhancing diagnostics, improving treatment outcomes, and streamlining administrative processes. In the global regulatory landscape, several countries are working on regulating AI in healthcare. There are five key regulatory issues that need to be addressed: (i)

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencegaps in regulatory frameworkshealthcare services

Identifiers

PMID39273754
PMCPMC11394803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.