Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273727›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Experiences and Perceptions of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Self-Sampling among Under-Screened Women in Flanders.

Charlotte Buelens, Margot Stabel, Alice Wildiers, Lieve Peremans, Guido Van Hal, Lotje Van Doorsselaere, Annouk Lievens, Alex Vorsters, Severien Van Keer, Veronique Verhoeven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charlotte BuelensDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Margot StabelDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Alice WildiersDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Lieve PeremansDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Guido Van HalDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4611-4076
Lotje Van DoorsselaereCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0001-0684-332X
Annouk LievensMarketing Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8167-3818
Alex VorstersCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0265-058X
Severien Van KeerCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-7478
Veronique VerhoevenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-6501

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders T004921N; ScreenUrSelf trial
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary Human Papillomavirus (HPV) screening on samples collected by women themselves has proven to be an effective strategy for cervical cancer screening (CCS) and may increase participation rates in women who do not partake (regularly) in screening. The aim of this study is to investigate reasons for non-participation and perceptions of CCS using self-sampling methods among under-screened women in Flanders. Individual interviews with 15 underscreened women aged 30-64 years were conducted. During the interviews, participants were given the opportunity to try out a urine and vaginal self-sampling kit. Thematic analysis was based on Ajzen's model of the Theory of Planned Behavior. The results showed that 14 out of 15 participants were more likely to participate in CCS if they had the option to self-sample. One of the main findings was a lack of knowledge on different aspects of cervical cancer. Most women had a positive attitude toward cancer screening and primary prevention such as HPV vaccination. Subjective norms were influenced by healthcare professionals, peers, and organized government initiatives. Informational, organizational, contextual, and emotional factors were mentioned as barriers as well as facilitators for participation. Additionally, high self-efficacy was considered to make self-sampling more convenient. All women showed the intention to use at least one method of self-sampling. We can conclude that women who do not participate in CCS would be more motivated to participate using self-sampling methods. Adequate education and guidance should be provided.

Indexed as

barriers and facilitatorscervical cancerHPVscreeningself-sampling

Identifiers

PMID39273727
PMCPMC12045144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.