Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273711›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Public Perceptions on the Use of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire.

Anantharaman Venkataraman, Ian Zhirui Hong, Lisa Cuiying Ho, Tess Lin Teo, Stefanie Hwee-Chee Ang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An International Physical Exercise Screening Questionnaire (IPESQ).International journal of emergency medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anantharaman VenkataramanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Emergency Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0307-3622
Ian Zhirui HongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Emergency Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Lisa Cuiying HoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore 544886, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7825-2521
Tess Lin TeoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Emergency Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Stefanie Hwee-Chee AngSport Cares, Sport Singapore, 3 Stadium Drive, Singapore 397630, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-administered pre-participation screening for physical activity (PA) requires an instrument that should be easily used and identify individuals at high risk. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q+) has been used for many years. Its ease of use and ability to identify those not fit to undergo PA has not been assessed. This study was to determine the rates of the PAR-Q+ in identifying adults who may not be fit for moderate or intense PA and obtain feedback on the use of this tool. A randomized, cross-sectional study involving a wide spectrum of members of the public was carried out. Participants were asked to provide their bio-characteristics, complete the PARQ+, and provide feedback on the questionnaire. With 1019 participants, about 33.1% of the participants using the PARQ+ would have required further medical evaluation. Except for those patients with respiratory illness, there was no difference in levels of PA in those who answered yes or no to the seven PARQ+ questions. Only 4 of the 7 main PAR-Q+ questions were perceived by the public as easily understood. Difficulties were encountered with 21 of the 45 follow-up questions, especially amongst those with co-morbidities. The wordiness of the questions and the large number of technical terms were also sources of concern. Suggestions were provided by participants on areas where improvements may be made to the wording of the questions. The study suggests that the PAR-Q+ probably over-identified those who require further medical evaluation. In addition, the wordiness of the questions and frequent use of medical jargon made the PARQ+ challenging to understand and use. The suggestions provide opportunities to review areas for possible improvements.

Indexed as

co-morbiditiesfeedbackphysical activityself-administered pre-participation survey

Identifiers

PMID39273711
PMCPMC11395539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.