SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific Antibodies in Adults with Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trial Data.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy vs. CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody as third- or later-line treatment in follicular lymphoma: a meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy-safety trade-off and patient selection: a meta-analysis informing clinical choice between CAR-T and bispecific antibodies for R/R B-NHL.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody achieved significant efficacy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after or refractory to CAR-T therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Dual-target immunotherapies in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of epcoritamab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 3-year follow-up from the EPCORE NHL-3 trial.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Targeting T-Cells for Cancer Treatment: Current Clinical Strategies and Challenges.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Special Issue: Antibody Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The effective and safe administration of Epcoritamab in relapsed CD19-CD5+ DLBCL following CAR-T therapy.Blood cell therapy · 2025Article
- Single-Agent and Associated Therapies with Monoclonal Antibodies: What About Follicular Lymphoma?Cancers · 2025Review
- Antibody Therapy for Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies: Past and Present.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Bispecific antibodies in the treatment of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer: an overview of current applications, challenges, and emerging opportunities.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Exploration of adverse event profiles for glofitamab: A disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging therapy in the treatment of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). There is a gap in the research on the safety and efficacy of bsAbs in adults with LBCL, with current research focusing on the wider non-Hodgkin's lymphoma population. To address this research gap, we conducted a systematic review aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of bsAbs in adults with LBCL. A systematized search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 10 April 2024. Interventional clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. Observational studies, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. According to the Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies, the included studies were largely of a high quality for safety outcome reporting, but of mixed quality for efficacy outcome reporting. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the results were discussed as a narrative synthesis. Nineteen early phase studies were evaluated in the final analysis, with a pooled sample size of 1332 patients. Nine bsAbs were investigated across the studies as monotherapy (nine studies) or in combination regimes (10 studies). The rates of cytokine release syndrome were variable, with any grade events ranging from 0 to 72.2%. Infection rates were consistently high across the reporting studies (38-60%). Cytopenias were found to be common, in particular, anemia (4.4-62%), thrombocytopenia (3.3-69%), and neutropenia (4.4-70%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade ≥3 adverse events were not commonly reported. Promising efficacy outcomes were reported, with median overall response rates of 95-100% in the front-line and 36-91% in terms of relapsed/refractory disease. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that bsAbs are generally well-tolerated and effective in adults with LBCL. BsAbs appear to have superior tolerability, but inferior efficacy to CAR T-cell therapies in adults with LBCL. Future research on safety and efficacy should focus on evaluating adverse event timing and management, the impact on the patient's quality of life, the burden on the healthcare system, and overall survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.