Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273668›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Interaction of Micro- and Nanoplastics with Enzymes: The Case of Carbonic Anhydrase.

Gregorio Polo, Francesca Lionetto, Maria Elena Giordano, Maria Giulia Lionetto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gregorio PoloDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Francesca LionettoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4466-1161
Maria Elena GiordanoDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Maria Giulia LionettoDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-0192

Funding

NextGenerationEU - PNRR Project n. CN_00000033; CUP: F87G22000290001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) have emerged as significant environmental pollutants with potential detrimental effects on ecosystems and human health. Several studies indicate their interaction with enzymes; this topic represents a multifaceted research field encompassing several areas of interest from the toxicological and ecotoxicological impact of MPs and NPs on humans and wildlife to the biodegradation of plastics by microbial enzymes. This review aims to provide a critical analysis of the state-of-the-art knowledge of the interaction of MPs and NPs on the enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA), providing recent insights, analyzing the knowledge gaps in the field, and drawing future perspectives of the research and its application. CA is a widespread and crucial enzyme in various organisms; it is critical for various physiological processes in animals, plants, and bacteria. It catalyzes the reversible hydration of CO

Indexed as

Carbonic AnhydrasesMicroplasticsNanoparticlesAnimalsEnvironmental PollutantsHumansCarbonic AnhydrasesEnvironmental PollutantsMicroplasticsbiomarkercarbonic anhydraseecotoxicological effectsemergent pollutantenzymesesterase activitymicroplasticsnanoplasticsplastic degradationtoxicological effects

Identifiers

PMID39273668
PMCPMC11396312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.