Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273416›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Green Leaf Volatiles: A New Player in the Protection against Abiotic Stresses?

Jurgen Engelberth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Identification of Transcription Factors ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Gaseous cues regenerate the periderm.Plant communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Volatile organic compounds inHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jurgen EngelberthDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78247, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-1954

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture 2020-65114-30767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the role of green leaf volatiles (GLVs) has been mainly constrained to protecting plants against pests and pathogens. However, increasing evidence suggests that among the stresses that can significantly harm plants, GLVs can also provide significant protection against heat, cold, drought, light, and salinity stress. But while the molecular basis for this protection is still largely unknown, it seems obvious that a common theme in the way GLVs work is that most, if not all, of these stresses are associated with physical damage to the plants, which, in turn, is the major event responsible for the production of GLVs. Here, I summarize the current state of knowledge on GLVs and abiotic stresses and provide a model explaining the multifunctionality of these compounds.

Indexed as

Plant LeavesStress, PhysiologicalVolatile Organic CompoundsPlantsVolatile Organic Compoundsabiotic stressairborne signalGLVgreen leaf volatilesplant damageplant protectionstructural integrityvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID39273416
PMCPMC11395555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.