Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273224›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Proteomic Investigation of Immune Checkpoints and Some of Their Inhibitors.

Marco Agostini, Pietro Traldi, Mahmoud Hamdan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco AgostiniIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7578-1233
Pietro TraldiIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.
Mahmoud HamdanIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoints are crucial molecules for the maintenance of antitumor immune responses. The activation or inhibition of these molecules is dependent on the interactions between receptors and ligands; such interactions can provide inhibitory or stimulatory signals to the various components of the immune system. Over the last 10 years, the inhibition of immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed cell death-1, and programmed cell death ligand-1, has taken a leading role in immune therapy. This relatively recent therapy regime is based on the use of checkpoint inhibitors, which enhance the immune response towards various forms of cancer. For a subset of patients with specific forms of cancer, these inhibitors can induce a durable response to therapy; however, the medium response rate to such therapy remains relatively poor. Recent research activities have demonstrated that the disease response to this highly promising therapy resembles the response of many forms of cancer to chemotherapy, where an encouraging initial response is followed by acquired resistance to treatment and progress of the disease. That said, these inhibitors are now used as single agents or in combination with chemotherapies as first or second lines of treatment for about 50 types of cancer. The prevailing opinion regarding immune therapy suggests that for this approach of therapy to deliver on its promise, a number of challenges have to be circumvented. These challenges include understanding the resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint blockade, the identification of more efficient inhibitors, extending their therapeutic benefits to a wider audience of cancer patients, better management of immune-related adverse side effects, and, more urgently the identification of biomarkers, which would help treating oncologists in the identification of patients who are likely to respond positively to the immune therapies and, last but not least, the prices of therapy which can be afforded by the highest number of patients. Numerous studies have demonstrated that understanding the interaction between these checkpoints and the immune system is essential for the development of efficient checkpoint inhibitors and improved immune therapies. In the present text, we discuss some of these checkpoints, their inhibitors, and some works in which mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses were applied.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsProteomicsAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint Proteinsimmune checkpointsimmune systemimmune therapy checkpoint inhibitors/therapiespost-translational modifications (PTMs)proteomic investigations

Identifiers

PMID39273224
PMCPMC11395526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.