ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Proteomic Investigation of Immune Checkpoints and Some of Their Inhibitors.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular dynamics insights into the redox effects on PD-1/PD-L1 and PD-1/PD-L2 interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancements in lung cancer: molecular insights, innovative therapies, and future prospects.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoints are crucial molecules for the maintenance of antitumor immune responses. The activation or inhibition of these molecules is dependent on the interactions between receptors and ligands; such interactions can provide inhibitory or stimulatory signals to the various components of the immune system. Over the last 10 years, the inhibition of immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed cell death-1, and programmed cell death ligand-1, has taken a leading role in immune therapy. This relatively recent therapy regime is based on the use of checkpoint inhibitors, which enhance the immune response towards various forms of cancer. For a subset of patients with specific forms of cancer, these inhibitors can induce a durable response to therapy; however, the medium response rate to such therapy remains relatively poor. Recent research activities have demonstrated that the disease response to this highly promising therapy resembles the response of many forms of cancer to chemotherapy, where an encouraging initial response is followed by acquired resistance to treatment and progress of the disease. That said, these inhibitors are now used as single agents or in combination with chemotherapies as first or second lines of treatment for about 50 types of cancer. The prevailing opinion regarding immune therapy suggests that for this approach of therapy to deliver on its promise, a number of challenges have to be circumvented. These challenges include understanding the resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint blockade, the identification of more efficient inhibitors, extending their therapeutic benefits to a wider audience of cancer patients, better management of immune-related adverse side effects, and, more urgently the identification of biomarkers, which would help treating oncologists in the identification of patients who are likely to respond positively to the immune therapies and, last but not least, the prices of therapy which can be afforded by the highest number of patients. Numerous studies have demonstrated that understanding the interaction between these checkpoints and the immune system is essential for the development of efficient checkpoint inhibitors and improved immune therapies. In the present text, we discuss some of these checkpoints, their inhibitors, and some works in which mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses were applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.