Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272930›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Abemaciclib Therapy Using the MonarchE Criteria Results in Large Numbers of Excess Axillary Node Clearances-Time to Pause and Reflect?

Daniel Ahari, Mark Wilkinson, Nisha Ali, Vicky P Taxiarchi, Rajiv V Dave, Ashu Gandhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel AhariWythenshawe Hospital and Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.
Mark WilkinsonWythenshawe Hospital and Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-2943-9370
Nisha AliWythenshawe Hospital and Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-305X
Vicky P TaxiarchiCentre for Women's Mental Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0737-098X
Rajiv V DaveWythenshawe Hospital and Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-8090
Ashu GandhiWythenshawe Hospital and Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-6201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The monarchE study added the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib to the care of women with oestrogen-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Eligibility required meeting monarchE criteria-either >3 positive axillary nodes, or 1-3 positive sentinel nodes (SNB+) with tumour size >50 mm or grade 3 cancers. Women were advised to proceed to completion axillary node clearance (cANC) if size/grade criteria were not fulfilled for >3 positive nodes to be identified. However, cANC is associated with significant morbidity, conflicting with the potential benefits of abemaciclib. We analysed data of 229 consecutive women (2016-2022) with ER+ breast cancer and SNB+ who proceeded to cANC, keeping with contemporary treatment guidelines. We used this cohort to assess numbers that, under national guidance in place currently, would be advised to undergo cANC solely to check eligibility for abemaciclib treatment. Using monarchE criteria, 90 women (39%) would have accessed abemaciclib based on SNB+ and size/grade, without cANC. In total, 139 women would have been advised to proceed to cANC to check eligibility, with only 15/139 (11%) having >3 positive nodes after sentinel node biopsy and cANC. The remaining 124 (89%) would have undergone cANC but remained ineligible for abemaciclib. Size, age, grade, and Ki67 did not predict >3 nodes at cANC. Following cANC, a large majority of women with ER+, <50 mm, and grade 1-2 tumours remain ineligible for abemaciclib yet are subject to significant morbidity including lifelong lymphoedema risk. The monarchE authors state that 15 women need abemaciclib therapy for 1 to clinically benefit. Thus, in our cohort, 139 women undergoing cANC would lead to one woman benefitting.

Indexed as

abemaciclibaxillary node clearanceCDK4/6 inhibitorsmonarchE study

Identifiers

PMID39272930
PMCPMC11394446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.