Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272890›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis.

Can Yurttas, Ruth Ladurner, André L Mihaljević, Jens Strohäker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Can YurttasDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-8243
Ruth LadurnerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
André L MihaljevićDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Jens StrohäkerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC is considered the standard of care for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, but evidence-based treatment recommendations for the therapy of peritoneal sarcomatosis are scarce. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal sarcomatosis between 2017 and 2024. (3) Results: Ten patients with a median age of 46.1 years (range: 23-77 years) with metachronous (40%) or synchronous (60%) peritoneal sarcomatosis from six different tumor entities were treated according to tumor board recommendation using CRS and HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin over 60 min at 42.0 °C. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital was 1.24 (0.6-1.9 days) and 11.1 days (6-17 days), respectively. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90% of the patients, with a median PSI of 11.5. Postoperative complications occurred in five cases, but no surgical revisions were necessary, and no acute kidney damage was recorded. (4) Conclusions: CRS with HIPEC in the presence of peritoneal sarcomatosis could be safely performed in our collective. Whether this resulted in an oncological treatment benefit cannot be concluded in view of the heterogeneous and small collective. Therefore, larger and prospective studies are warranted.

Indexed as

peritoneal metastasisregional cancer therapysoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID39272890
PMCPMC11394334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.