ArticleCancers2024
Recurrence Rates and Patterns after Radical Resection of Lung Carcinoids.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining the Role of Chemotherapy and Targeted Cytotoxic Delivery in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- Editorial: Lung Cancer-From Mechanisms of Action and Risk Factors in Disease Onset to Management.Cancers · 2026Article
- Tumor biology versus nodal stage in predicting survival after resection of pulmonary atypical carcinoids.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Follow-up is not justified in patients with typical lung carcinoids without lymph node involvement treated with curative intent: A Danish Multi-ENETS Center of Excellence Study.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical lung carcinoid (AC) is widely accepted to recur more often after radical resection than typical lung carcinoid (TC). However, their recurrence rates have never been compared in a multi-state competing risks model. We retrospectively reviewed files from patients with AC and TC who had been radically resected at our European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence between 2009 and 2020. We estimated the recurrence rates between the AC and TC patients counting unrelated death as a competing event using Aalen-Johansen estimates and compared them using a multi-state Cox model. Finally, we analyzed all AC and TC recurrences as to resection type, pathological stage, resection margin, recurrence site, and time to recurrence. The study included 217 patients, of whom 194 had TC and 23 had AC. The median follow-up was 9.4 years. The AC patients experienced recurrence at a higher rate (hazard ratio [HR] 16.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-47.9,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.