Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272801›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

MRI T2w Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models in Imaging Simulated Biopsy Add Diagnostic Value to PI-RADS in Predicting Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Diagnostic Study.

Jia-Cheng Liu, Xiao-Hao Ruan, Tsun-Tsun Chun, Chi Yao, Da Huang, Hoi-Lung Wong, Chun-Ting Lai, Chiu-Fung Tsang, Sze-Ho Ho, Tsui-Lin Ng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jia-Cheng LiuDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Xiao-Hao RuanDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Tsun-Tsun ChunDepartment of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi YaoDepartment of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Da HuangDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Hoi-Lung WongDepartment of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Chun-Ting LaiDepartment of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Chiu-Fung TsangDepartment of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Sze-Ho HoDepartment of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Tsui-Lin NgDepartment of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Dan-Feng XuDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Rong NaDepartment of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7470-5108

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 81972405, 82372725, and 82173045 to Danfeng XuScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality grants 20Y11904700, 22Y11905400 to Danfeng XuSeed Fund for PI Research at HKU 104006730Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Macau Science and Technology Program Category C; SGDX20220530111403024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, prostate cancer (PCa) prebiopsy medical image diagnosis mainly relies on mpMRI and PI-RADS scores. However, PI-RADS has its limitations, such as inter- and intra-radiologist variability and the potential for imperceptible features. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a machine learning model based on radiomics analysis of MRI T2-weighted (T2w) images for predicting PCa in prebiopsy cases.

methodA retrospective analysis was conducted using 820 lesions (363 cases, 457 controls) from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) Database for model development and validation. An additional 83 lesions (30 cases, 53 controls) from Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital were used for independent external validation. The MRI T2w images were preprocessed, and radiomic features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using Cross Validation Least Angle Regression (CV-LARS). Using three different machine learning algorithms, a total of 18 prediction models and 3 shape control models were developed. The performance of the models, including the area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic values such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were compared to the PI-RADS scoring system for both internal and external validation.

resultsAll the models showed significant differences compared to the shape control model (all

conclusionsThe machine learning model based on radiomics analysis of MRI T2w images, along with simulated biopsy, provides additional diagnostic value to the PI-RADS scoring system in predicting PCa.

Indexed as

biopsymachine learningmulti-parametric magnetic resonance imagingprostate cancerprostate imaging reporting and data systemradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39272801
PMCPMC11394278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.