Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272792›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Efficacy and Safety of Cryoablation in Barrett's Esophagus and Comparison with Radiofrequency Ablation: A Meta-Analysis.

Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Benjamin Norton, Andrea Telese, Daryl Ramai, Alberto Murino, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, John Vargo, Rehan J Haidry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Apostolis PapaefthymiouDigestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3563-4973
Benjamin NortonDigestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2058-3162
Andrea TeleseDigestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK.
Daryl RamaiGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Alberto MurinoDigestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK.
Paraskevas GkolfakisDepartment of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 142 33 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-4013
John VargoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Rehan J HaidryDigestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mainstay approach in endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) includes the endoscopic resection of visible lesions, accompanied by ablation of the residual metaplastic epithelium. Cryoablation therapy is one such emerging ablation technique in this field. This systematic review with a meta-analysis aims to accumulate pooled data on cryoablation performance in the treatment of patients with BE and to compare this technique to the standard of care radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

methodsThe MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched until June 2024 for studies evaluating BE management using cryoablation for cumulative results. The primary outcome was the complete eradication of dysplasia (CED) and intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) in BE compared to RFA, while secondary outcomes included the respective pooled rates using cryoablation, recurrence, and adverse events, with a separate analysis for strictures. The meta-analyses were based on a random-effects model, and the results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by type of cryoablation were also performed.

resultsTwenty-three studies (1604 patients) were finally included, four of which were comparative. CED and CEIM did not differ significantly between cryoablation and RFA [OR= 0.95 (95%CI: 0.50-1.81) and OR = 0.57 (95%CI: 0.20-1.63), respectively)]. The pooled rates of CED, CEIM, and recurrence after cryoablation were 84.2% (95%CI: 79.1-89.3), 64.1% (95%CI: 49.2-79.0), and 8.3% (95%CI: 4.7-11.9), accompanied by high rates of heterogeneity. Adverse events were noted in 14.5% (95%CI: 9.9-19.2) of cases, and 6.5% (95%CI: 4.1-9.0) developed strictures. In the subgroup analysis, the cryoballoon achieved a reduction in heterogeneity in CED, adverse events, and stricture formation, whereas spray catheters provided homogenous results in terms of recurrence.

conclusionsCryoablation provides equal outcomes compared to RFA in the treatment of patients with BE, with the cryoballoon achieving relatively homogenous rates of CED and adverse events.

Indexed as

Barrett’s esophaguscryoablationcryotherapyradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID39272792
PMCPMC11394299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.