Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272767›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Integrated Assessment of OCT, Multimodal Imaging, and Cytokine Markers for Predicting Treatment Responses in Retinal Vein Occlusion Associated Macular Edema: A Comparative Review of Anti-VEGF and Steroid Therapies.

Marion R Munk, Lala Ceklic, Richard Stillenmunkes, Varun Chaudhary, Nadia Waheed, Jay Chhablani, Marc D de Smet, Anne Tillmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marion R MunkAugenarzt Praxisgemeinschaft Gutblick, 8808 Pfäffikon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-2242
Lala CeklicDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Richard StillenmunkesAugenarzt Praxisgemeinschaft Gutblick, 8808 Pfäffikon, Switzerland.
Varun ChaudharyDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Nadia WaheedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-3558
Marc D de SmetMicroInvasive Ocular Surgery Center, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-5603
Anne TillmannAugenarzt Praxisgemeinschaft Gutblick, 8808 Pfäffikon, Switzerland.

Funding

Allergan AG, Abbvie not available
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant cause of vision loss, characterized by the occlusion of retinal veins, leading to conditions such as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Macular edema (ME), a prevalent consequence of RVO, is the primary cause of vision impairment in affected patients. Anti-VEGF agents have become the standard treatment, showing efficacy in improving visual acuity (VA) and reducing ME. However, a subset of patients exhibit a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF therapy, necessitating alternative treatments. Corticosteroids, which address inflammatory pathways implicated in ME, have shown promise, particularly in cases resistant to anti-VEGF. This review aims to identify biomarkers that predict treatment response to corticosteroids in RVO-associated ME, utilizing multimodal imaging and cytokine assessments. Baseline imaging, including SD-OCT and OCT-A, is essential for evaluating biomarkers like hyperreflective foci (HRF), serous retinal detachment (SRF), and central retinal thickness (CRT). Elevated cytokine levels, such as IL-6 and MCP-1, correlate with ME severity and poor anti-VEGF response. Early identification of these biomarkers can guide timely transitions to corticosteroid therapy, potentially enhancing treatment outcomes. The practical conclusion of this review is that integrating biomarker assessment into clinical practice enables personalized treatment decisions, allowing for earlier and more effective management of RVO-associated ME by transitioning patients to corticosteroid therapy when anti-VEGF agents are insufficient. Advanced diagnostics and machine learning may further refine personalized treatment strategies, improving the management of RVO-associated ME.

Indexed as

anti-VEGF therapybranch retinal vein occlusioncentral retinal vein occlusioncorticosteroid treatmentcytokine assessmentsimaging biomarkersmacular edemaretinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID39272767
PMCPMC11394301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.