ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Modeling Realistic Geometries in Human Intrathoracic Airways.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining 3D Multi-Object Reconstruction with Finite Element Analysis for Accurate Dental Modelling and Restoration.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Multidimensional lung imaging: integrated preclinical platforms enabling the identification of translational biomarkers for pulmonary research.Respiratory research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geometrical models of the airways offer a comprehensive perspective on the complex interplay between lung structure and function. Originating from mathematical frameworks, these models have evolved to include detailed lung imagery, a crucial enhancement that aids in the early detection of morphological changes in the airways, which are often the first indicators of diseases. The accurate representation of airway geometry is crucial in research areas such as biomechanical modeling, acoustics, and particle deposition prediction. This review chronicles the evolution of these models, from their inception in the 1960s based on ideal mathematical constructs, to the introduction of advanced imaging techniques like computerized tomography (CT) and, to a lesser degree, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The advent of these techniques, coupled with the surge in data processing capabilities, has revolutionized the anatomical modeling of the bronchial tree. The limitations and challenges in both mathematical and image-based modeling are discussed, along with their applications. The foundation of image-based modeling is discussed, and recent segmentation strategies from CT and MRI scans and their clinical implications are also examined. By providing a chronological review of these models, this work offers insights into the evolution and potential future of airway geometry modeling, setting the stage for advancements in diagnosing and treating lung diseases. This review offers a novel perspective by highlighting how advancements in imaging techniques and data processing capabilities have significantly enhanced the accuracy and applicability of airway geometry models in both clinical and research settings. These advancements provide unique opportunities for developing patient-specific models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.