ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Scheimpflug Tomographic Indices for Classifying Normal, Down Syndrome and Clinical Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the precision of different Pentacam indices in diagnosing keratoconus (KC) in pediatric patients with and without Down Syndrome (DS) and determine suitable cutoff values. This prospective multicenter cross-sectional study evaluated 216 eyes of 131 patients aged 6-18 years (mean age 12.5 ± 3.2 years) using Pentacam. Patients were categorized into four groups: KC, forme fruste keratoconus (FK), DS, and control, excluding DS patients with topographic KC. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoff points and compare the accuracy in identifying KC and FK in patients with and without DS. In DS patients, corneal morphology resembled KC features. The most effective indices for distinguishing KC in DS patients were the average pachymetric progression index (AUC = 0.961), higher-order aberration of the anterior cornea (AUC = 0.953), anterior elevation (AUC = 0.946), posterior elevation (AUC = 0.947), index of vertical asymmetry (AUC = 0.943), and Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia total derivation value (AUC = 0.941). None of the indices showed good accuracy for distinguishing FK in DS patients. The thresholds of these indices differed significantly from non-DS patients. The results highlighted the need for DS-specific cutoff values to avoid false-positive or false-negative diagnoses in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.