ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Back to Basics: The Diagnostic Value of a Complete Blood Count in the Clinical Management of COVID-19.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Antibiotic Initiation After DaBT-Hib-IPV Vaccination in NICU-Hospitalized Preterm Infants: The Role of C-Reactive Protein.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index, and HALP Score as Predictors of Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Immune-inflammatory-nutritional dysfunction in HIV-negative patients with asymptomatic neurosyphilis: a retrospective comparative study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio a Prognostic Tool in Endometrial Cancer Among Classical Prognostic Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists have struggled significantly to understand the complexity of COVID-19 pathophysiology. COVID-19 has demonstrated a notoriously unpredictable clinical course. This unpredictability constituted a significant obstacle to clinicians in predicting the disease course among COVID-19 patients, more specifically, in predicting who would develop severe cases and possibly die from the infection. This brief report aims to assess the diagnostic value of using a complete blood count (CBC) and applying high-dimensional analysis, i.e., principal component analysis (PCA), on it to differentiate between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 infection. The data of 855 patients were retrieved from multiple centres in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics, such as counts, percentages, and medians (interquartile ranges) were used to describe patients' characteristics and CBC parameters. Analytical statistics, such as the Mann-Whitney
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.