ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
CT Angiography for Aortic Arch Anomalies: Prevalence, Diagnostic Efficacy, and Illustrative Findings.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive CT Angiography Assessment of Internal Thoracic Artery Morphometry, Anatomical Relationships, and Perforating Branches.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Review
- Hemodynamic simulation in the aortic arch under anemic, diabetic, and healthy blood flow conditions using computational fluid dynamics.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transposition of an isolated left vertebral artery during aortic arch replacement for Stanford type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Vascular ring due to double aortic arch as a cause of stridor and dysphagia in infancy: a case report.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic arch anomalies encompass a diverse spectrum of conditions. Elucidating the prevalence of these anomalies, their impact on patient wellbeing, and the most effective diagnostic tools are crucial steps in ensuring optimal patient care. This paper aims to explore the various presentations of aortic arch anomalies, emphasizing the remarkable utility of computed tomography (CT) angiography in their definitive diagnosis and characterization. We conducted a retrospective study on patients who were submitted to the CT angiography of the thoracic aorta or supra-aortic trunks, or the contrast-enhanced CT scans of the thorax and/or cervical region between January 2021 and February 2024 in our Hospital. Out of the total of 2350 patients, 18 were diagnosed with aortic arch anomalies, with an average age of approximately 55 years. The aortic arch anomalies identified in the study were as follows: left aortic arch with the aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery, right aortic arch (types I and II), double aortic arch, aortic coarctation, aortic pseudocoarctation, and ductus diverticulum. Although often asymptomatic, aortic arch anomalies require recognition and CT using advanced post-processing techniques is the optimal diagnostic method with the ability to also identify other associated cardiac or vascular malformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.