ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Effects of Different Roasting Methods on the Quality of Roasted Large Yellow Croaker (
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of instrumental flavor profiles in pork with salted vegetable during frozen storage revealed by GC-IMS, E-nose, and E-tongue.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Effects of Thawing Methods on the Roasting Quality and Flavor Profiles of Reduced-Salt Marinated Large Yellow Croaker (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of InoculatingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of Different Water Contents on the Quality Characteristics of Roasted Large Yellow Croaker (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of different roasting methods (45% light wave and 55% microwave roasting, 70% light wave and 30% microwave roasting, 100% light wave roasting, far-infrared roasting, and oven roasting) on the quality of roasted large yellow croaker. The quality was evaluated using sensory evaluation, texture characteristics, color differences, moisture content, and volatile flavor substances. In this context, different roasting methods can affect the color, taste, and flavor of large yellow croaker fish, significantly improving the overall acceptance of roasted fish. The results showed that after 45% light wave and 55% microwave roasting, the elasticity of fish meat was maintained, the hardness of fish meat was reduced, the moisture content and distribution were changed, and the taste was the best. Far-infrared roasting and 45% light wave and 55% microwave roasting had a significant effect on the color of large yellow croaker samples and improved the sensory evaluation score. Forty-six volatile compounds were detected using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. After roasting, the oxidation and Maillard reactions of lipids and proteins were increased, with the 45% light wave and 55% microwave roasting giving the highest variety of volatile flavor substance products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.