ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Technological Properties of Inulin-Enriched Doughs and Breads, Influence on Short-Term Storage and Glycemic Response.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Fiber and Processing Interventions for Enhanced Batters and Final Baked Products: A Review.International journal of food science · 2026Review
- Qualitative Characteristics of Semolina-Pulse Flour Mixes and Related Breads.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Moisture Sorption Isotherms of Fructooligosaccharide and Inulin Powders and Their Gelling Competence in Delaying the Retrogradation of Rice Starch.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polydextrose Addition Improves the Chewiness and Extended Shelf-Life of Chinese Steamed Bread Through the Formation of a Sticky, Elastic Network Structure.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Valorization of Artichoke Bracts in Pasta Enrichment: Impact on Nutritional, Technological, Antioxidant, and Sensorial Properties.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of inulin in food is highly appreciated by consumers because of its prebiotic effect. In this study, the effects of increasing additions (5, 10 and 20%) of inulin as a substitute for wheat flour in bread production were investigated with regard to the physical, technological and rheological properties of the flour blends. Inulin reduced the water-binding capacity from 1.4 g/100 g with 0 flour to 0.80 g/100 g with the 20% inulin addition, while there were no statistical differences in the oil-binding capacity. The addition of inulin also influenced the yeast rates, especially in the samples with 5 and 10% addition. On the farinograph, inulin caused a reduction in water absorption (40.75 g/100 g with 20% inulin), an increase in dough development time (18.35 min with 10% inulin) and dough stability (13.10 min with 10% inulin). The mixograph showed a longer kneading time for the sample with 20% inulin (8.70 min) than for the control (4.61 min). In addition, there was an increase in dough firmness and tightness due to the addition of inulin (W: 203 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.