Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272446›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Construction of a Food Safety Evaluation System Based on the Factor Analysis of Mixed Data Method.

Yiqiong Liu, Shengmei Cai, Xuelei He, Xiaowei He, Tianli Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiqiong LiuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Shengmei CaiSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Xuelei HeSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-0130
Xiaowei HeSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Tianli YueCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.

Funding

Central Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund 2023ZY1-CGZY-02National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food safety evaluation, which aims to reflect food safety status, is an important part of food safety management. Traditional food evaluation methods often consider limited data, and the evaluation process is subjective, time-consuming, and difficult to popularize. We developed a new food safety evaluation system that incorporates simple qualification degrees, food consumption, project hazard degrees, sales channels, food production regions, and other information obtained from food safety sampling and inspection to reflect the food safety situation accurately, objectively, and comprehensively. This evaluation model combined the statistical method and the machine learning method. The optimal distance method was used to calculate the basic qualification degree, and then expert elicitation via a questionnaire and the factor analysis of mixed data method (FADM) was applied to modify the basic qualification degree so as to obtain the food safety index, which indicates food safety status. Then, the effectiveness of this new method was verified by calculating and analyzing of the food safety index in region X. The results show that this model can clearly distinguish food safety levels in different cities and food categories and identify food safety trends in different years. Thus, this food safety evaluation system based on the FADM quantifies the real food safety level, screens out cities and food categories with high food safety risks, and, finally, helps to optimize the allocation of regulatory resources and provide technical and theoretical support for government decision-making.

Indexed as

evaluation indexexpert elicitationFADMfood safetymachine learningsampling inspection

Identifiers

PMID39272446
PMCPMC11394990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.