Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272238›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Automated Measurement of Cattle Dimensions Using Improved Keypoint Detection Combined with Unilateral Depth Imaging.

Cheng Peng, Shanshan Cao, Shujing Li, Tao Bai, Zengyuan Zhao, Wei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Keypoint-Based Forest Musk Deer Behavioral Recognition Method.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng PengCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Shanshan CaoAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100080, China.
Shujing LiHebei Tianhe Beef Cattle Farming Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Tao BaiCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Zengyuan ZhaoHebei Tianhe Beef Cattle Farming Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Wei SunAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100080, China.

Funding

the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Science and Technology Innovation Project (10-IAED-RC-09-2024) and the Jilin Province Key Research and Development Project (20240303079NC). (10-IAED-RC-09-2024) ; (20240303079NC).the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of the Autonomous Region (XJEDU2022J009); and special Fund for Basic Research Operations of Public Welfare Research Institutes at the Agricultural Information Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricult (XJEDU2022J009); (JBYW-AII-2023-10).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional measurement methods often rely on manual operations, which are not only inefficient but also cause stress to cattle, affecting animal welfare. Currently, non-contact cattle dimension measurement usually involves the use of multi-view images combined with point cloud or 3D reconstruction technologies, which are costly and less flexible in actual farming environments. To address this, this study proposes an automated cattle dimension measurement method based on an improved keypoint detection model combined with unilateral depth imaging. Firstly, YOLOv8-Pose is selected as the keypoint detection model and SimSPPF replaces the original SPPF to optimize spatial pyramid pooling, reducing computational complexity. The CARAFE architecture, which enhances upsampling content-aware capabilities, is introduced at the neck. The improved YOLOv8-pose achieves a mAP of 94.4%, a 2% increase over the baseline model. Then, cattle keypoints are captured on RGB images and mapped to depth images, where keypoints are optimized using conditional filtering on the depth image. Finally, cattle dimension parameters are calculated using the cattle keypoints combined with Euclidean distance, the Moving Least Squares (MLS) method, Radial Basis Functions (RBFs), and Cubic B-Spline Interpolation (CB-SI). The average relative errors for the body height, lumbar height, body length, and chest girth of the 23 measured beef cattle were 1.28%, 3.02%, 6.47%, and 4.43%, respectively. The results show that the method proposed in this study has high accuracy and can provide a new approach to non-contact beef cattle dimension measurement.

Indexed as

beef cattle body measurementskeypoint detectionnon-contact measurement technologyprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID39272238
PMCPMC11393998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.