ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Automated Measurement of Cattle Dimensions Using Improved Keypoint Detection Combined with Unilateral Depth Imaging.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Keypoint-Based Forest Musk Deer Behavioral Recognition Method.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effects of Lysolecithin on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Serum Biochemical Indices, and Rumen Environment in Holstein Calves.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Detection of Remaining Feed in the Feed Troughs of Flat-Fed Meat Ducks Based on the RGB-D Sensor and YOLO V8.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional measurement methods often rely on manual operations, which are not only inefficient but also cause stress to cattle, affecting animal welfare. Currently, non-contact cattle dimension measurement usually involves the use of multi-view images combined with point cloud or 3D reconstruction technologies, which are costly and less flexible in actual farming environments. To address this, this study proposes an automated cattle dimension measurement method based on an improved keypoint detection model combined with unilateral depth imaging. Firstly, YOLOv8-Pose is selected as the keypoint detection model and SimSPPF replaces the original SPPF to optimize spatial pyramid pooling, reducing computational complexity. The CARAFE architecture, which enhances upsampling content-aware capabilities, is introduced at the neck. The improved YOLOv8-pose achieves a mAP of 94.4%, a 2% increase over the baseline model. Then, cattle keypoints are captured on RGB images and mapped to depth images, where keypoints are optimized using conditional filtering on the depth image. Finally, cattle dimension parameters are calculated using the cattle keypoints combined with Euclidean distance, the Moving Least Squares (MLS) method, Radial Basis Functions (RBFs), and Cubic B-Spline Interpolation (CB-SI). The average relative errors for the body height, lumbar height, body length, and chest girth of the 23 measured beef cattle were 1.28%, 3.02%, 6.47%, and 4.43%, respectively. The results show that the method proposed in this study has high accuracy and can provide a new approach to non-contact beef cattle dimension measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.