Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272216›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2024

Computational Methods for Image Analysis in Craniofacial Development and Disease.

E James, A J Caetano, P T Sharpe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E JamesCentre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
A J CaetanoCentre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-3241
P T SharpeCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2116-9561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observation is at the center of all biological sciences. Advances in imaging technologies are therefore essential to derive novel biological insights to better understand the complex workings of living systems. Recent high-throughput sequencing and imaging techniques are allowing researchers to simultaneously address complex molecular variations spatially and temporarily in tissues and organs. The availability of increasingly large dataset sizes has allowed for the evolution of robust deep learning models, designed to interrogate biomedical imaging data. These models are emerging as transformative tools in diagnostic medicine. Combined, these advances allow for dynamic, quantitative, and predictive observations of entire organisms and tissues. Here, we address 3 main tasks of bioimage analysis, image restoration, segmentation, and tracking and discuss new computational tools allowing for 3-dimensional spatial genomics maps. Finally, we demonstrate how these advances have been applied in studies of craniofacial development and oral disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningGenomicsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaxillofacial DevelopmentSkulladvanced imagingbioinformaticsdeep learningdevelopmental biologymultiomicsspatial genomics

Identifiers

PMID39272216
PMCPMC11633063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.