Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272209›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2024

Cell therapy using ex vivo reprogrammed macrophages enhances antitumor immune responses in melanoma.

Satish Kumar Reddy Noonepalle, Maria Gracia-Hernandez, Nima Aghdam, Michael Berrigan, Hawa Coulibaly, Xintang Li, Christian Zevallos-Delgado, Andrew Pletcher, Bryan Weselman, Erica Palmer and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Satish Kumar Reddy Noonepalle *Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Maria Gracia-Hernandez *The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Nima AghdamLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Michael BerriganThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hawa CoulibalyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Xintang LiLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Christian Zevallos-DelgadoThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrew PletcherThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Bryan WeselmanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Erica PalmerThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Tessa KnoxThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Eduardo SotomayorTampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Katherine B ChiappinelliThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Duncan WardropUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anelia HorvathThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Brett A ShookThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Norman LeeThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Anatoly DritschiloLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Rohan FernandesThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Karthik MusunuriAvstera Therapeutics, Malvern, PA, USA.
Maho ShibataThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Alejandro VillagraLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, E416 Research Bldg, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. Alejandro.villagra@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Development of selective HDAC6 inhibitors to improve cancer immunotherapyR01CA249248 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VILLAGRA, ALEJANDRO V, WARDROP, DUNCAN JOHN · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Cancer Research Institute 228514NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249248NCI NIH HHS R01CA249248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophage-based cell therapies have shown modest success in clinical trials, which can be attributed to their phenotypic plasticity, where transplanted macrophages get reprogrammed towards a pro-tumor phenotype. In most tumor types, including melanoma, the balance between antitumor M1-like and tumor-promoting M2-like macrophages is critical in defining the local immune response with a higher M1/M2 ratio favoring antitumor immunity. Therefore, designing novel strategies to increase the M1/M2 ratio in the TME has high clinical significance and benefits macrophage-based cell therapies.

methodsIn this study, we reprogrammed antitumor and proinflammatory macrophages ex-vivo with HDAC6 inhibitors (HDAC6i). We administered the reprogrammed macrophages intratumorally as an adoptive cell therapy (ACT) in the syngeneic SM1 murine melanoma model and patient-derived xenograft bearing NSG-SGM3 humanized mouse models. We phenotyped the tumor-infiltrated immune cells by flow cytometry and histological analysis of tumor sections for macrophage markers. We performed bulk RNA-seq profiling of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages treated with vehicle or HDAC6i and single-cell RNA-seq profiling of SM1 tumor-infiltrated immune cells to determine the effect of intratumor macrophage ACT on the tumor microenvironment (TME). We further analyzed the single-cell data to identify key cell-cell interactions and trajectory analysis to determine the fate of tumor-associated macrophages post-ACT.

resultsMacrophage ACT resulted in diminished tumor growth in both mouse models. We also demonstrated that HDAC6 inhibition in macrophages suppressed the polarization toward tumor-promoting phenotype by attenuating STAT3-mediated M2 reprogramming. Two weeks post-transplantation, ACT macrophages were viable, and inhibition of HDAC6 rendered intratumor transplanted M1 macrophages resistant to repolarization towards protumor M2 phenotype in-vivo. Further characterization of tumors by flow cytometry, single-cell transcriptomics, and single-cell secretome analyses revealed a significant enrichment of antitumor M1-like macrophages, resulting in increased M1/M2 ratio and infiltration of CD8 effector T-cells. Computational analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data for cell-cell interactions and trajectory analyses indicated activation of monocytes and T-cells in the TME.

conclusionsIn summary, for the first time, we demonstrated the potential of reprogramming macrophages ex-vivo with HDAC6 inhibitors as a viable macrophage cell therapy to treat solid tumors.

Indexed as

MacrophagesMelanomaAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell Line, TumorCellular ReprogrammingDisease Models, AnimalHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMiceTumor MicroenvironmentHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39272209
PMCPMC11401321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.