Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272151›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2024

Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: known unknowns.

Namrita Dhillon, Rohinton T Kamakaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Namrita DhillonDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Rohinton T KamakakaDepartment of MCD Biology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. Rohinton@ucsc.edu.

Funding

University of California, Santa Cruz COR CFA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a persistent and highly stable form of gene repression. It involves DNA silencers and repressor proteins that bind nucleosomes. The silenced state is influenced by numerous factors including the concentration of repressors, nature of activators, architecture of regulatory elements, modifying enzymes and the dynamics of chromatin.Silencers function to increase the residence time of repressor Sir proteins at silenced domains while clustering of silenced domains enables increased concentrations of repressors and helps facilitate long-range interactions. The presence of an accessible NDR at the regulatory regions of silenced genes, the cycling of chromatin configurations at regulatory sites, the mobility of Sir proteins, and the non-uniform distribution of the Sir proteins across the silenced domain, all result in silenced chromatin that only stably silences weak promoters and enhancers via changes in transcription burst duration and frequency.These data collectively suggest that silencing is probabilistic and the robustness of silencing is achieved through sub-optimization of many different nodes of action such that a stable expression state is generated and maintained even though individual constituents are in constant flux.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGene SilencingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinPromoter Regions, GeneticRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticChromatinRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID39272151
PMCPMC11401328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.