Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272125›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Evaluation of the usability and acceptability of the P-STEP® mobile app: feasibility study protocol.

Hannah Worboys, Laura Gray, Sarah Anthony, Rachel Hobson, Tim Lucas, Andre Ng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05830318 (Usability and Acceptability Study of the P-STEP Mobile Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05830318 completednot on this map

Usability and Acceptability Study of the P-STEP Mobile Application

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeicesterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled178ConditionsAsthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Interstitial Lung Disease, Coronary Heart DiseaseArmsP-STEP Mobile Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah WorboysDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. hw315@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-0180
Laura GrayDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Sarah AnthonyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Rachel HobsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Tim LucasDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Andre NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new P-STEP® (Personalised Space Technology Exercise Platform) app is designed to bring together tailored exercise guidance and up-to-date air quality information. The app allows individuals to plan outdoor exercise walking routes while minimising their exposure to air pollution. Individuals with chronic long-term conditions, particularly respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, can use the app in order to minimise the risk of their symptoms being exacerbated by pollution, while still gaining the benefits of outdoor exercise.

methodsThis study will measure the usability and acceptability of the P-STEP® app. The study will take the form of a single-arm 12-week app pilot study based in Leicestershire, United Kingdom (UK). We will recruit a maximum of 380 participants from an existing cohort study to pilot the app for 12 weeks. Questionnaire data will be collected at three timepoints, baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the System Usability Scale at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the User Engagement Scale Short Form, SF-12, Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ), bespoke, app specific usability questions, and feasibility outcomes. Additional data collected includes participant demographic information, technology self-efficacy and adverse events. Weekly anonymised usage data from the app will also be collected by the app team and analysed separately to complement the questionnaire data. DISCUSSION: This study will help us better understand the feasibility and acceptability of using the P-STEP® in the community. The results will also help inform future studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the South West Frenchay Research Ethics (23/SW/0060) Committee. There is no need for further approval from the Health Research Authority as the study is not taking place in the NHS. The ClinicalTrials.gov ID number is NCT05830318.

Indexed as

EnvironmentPhysical ExercisePollution

Identifiers

PMID39272125
PMCPMC11395691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.