Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272084›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Development of an infertility perception scale for women (IPS-W).

Miok Kim, Minkyung Ban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miok KimDepartment of Nursing, College of Nursing, Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea.
Minkyung BanDepartment of Nursing, College of Nursing, Catholic University of Pusan, Busan, South Korea. vanmin@cup.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1F1A106291912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop an Infertility Perception Scale for Women (IPS-W).

methodsInitial items were based on an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with five infertile women and fifteen women not diagnosed with infertility. Forty-one items were derived from a pilot survey. Data were collected from 203 women who had experienced intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) more than once. The data were analyzed to verify the reliability and validity of the scale.

resultsFour factors containing 21 items were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to verify the construct validity. The four factors of infertility perception scale were perceived feelings, personal stigma, social stigma, and acceptance. These factors explained 59.3% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a four-factor structure of the 21-item IPS-W. All fit indices were satisfactory (χ

conclusionThe scale reflects the perception of infertility within the cultural context of Korea. The findings can help nurses provide support that is appropriate for individual circumstances by examining how women experiencing infertility perceive infertility.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemalePsychometricsSocial StigmaAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPerceptionReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesFactor analysis, statisticalInfertility, femalePerceptionSocial stigma

Identifiers

PMID39272084
PMCPMC11401316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.