ArticleBMC veterinary research2024
Molecular and in silico analyses for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and highly pathogenic enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) using genetic markers located on plasmid, O Island 57 and O Island 71.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable learning algorithms enable pathogenic potential assessment and virulence-associated gene discovery ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- First report ofASM case reports · 2025Article
- Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli plasmid diversity reveals virulence potential and control opportunities in animal hosts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Prevalence, identification of virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance properties of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains isolated from ice cream and juice in sales centers.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Virulence plasmids in edema disease: Insights from whole-genome analysis of porcine O139:H1 Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to the diversity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates, detecting highly pathogenic strains in foodstuffs is challenging. Currently, reference protocols for STEC rely on the molecular detection of eae and the stx1 and/or stx2 genes, followed by the detection of serogroup-specific wzx or wzy genes related to the top 7 serogroups. However, these screening methods do not distinguish between samples in which a STEC possessing both determinants are present and those containing two or more organisms, each containing one of these genes. This study aimed to evaluate ecf1, Z2098, Z2099, and nleA genes as single markers and their combinations (ecf1/Z2098, ecf1/Z2099, ecf1/nleA, Z2098/Z2099, Z2098/nleA, and Z2099/nleA) as genetic markers to detect potentially pathogenic STEC by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 96 animal samples, as well as in 52 whole genome sequences of human samples via in silico PCR analyses.
resultsIn animal isolates, Z2098 and Z2098/Z2099 showed a strong association with the detected top 7 isolates, with 100% and 69.2% of them testing positive, respectively. In human isolates, Z2099 was detected in 95% of the top 7 HUS isolates, while Z2098/Z2099 and ecf1/Z2099 were detected in 87.5% of the top 7 HUS isolates.
conclusionsOverall, using a single gene marker, Z2098, Z2099, and ecf1 are sensitive targets for screening the top 7 STEC isolates, and the combination of Z2098/Z2099 offers a more targeted initial screening method to detect the top 7 STEC isolates. Detecting non-top 7 STEC in both animal and human samples proved challenging due to inconsistent characteristics associated with the genetic markers studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.