ArticleBMC medical genomics2024
Construction of a molecular diagnostic system for neurogenic rosacea by combining transcriptome sequencing and machine learning.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026Review
- Objective assessment of rosacea erythema severity: a multimodal artificial intelligence framework integrating VISIA® imaging and image-derived tabular features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical characteristics of neurogenic rosacea and erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: a cross-sectional observational study.Annals of medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with neurogenic rosacea (NR) frequently demonstrate pronounced neurological manifestations, often unresponsive to conventional therapeutic approaches. A molecular-level understanding and diagnosis of this patient cohort could significantly guide clinical interventions. In this study, we amalgamated our sequencing data (n = 46) with a publicly accessible database (n = 38) to perform an unsupervised cluster analysis of the integrated dataset. The eighty-four rosacea patients were partitioned into two distinct clusters. Neurovascular biomarkers were found to be elevated in cluster 1 compared to cluster 2. Pathways in cluster 1 were predominantly involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, transmission, and functionality, whereas cluster 2 pathways were centered on inflammation-related processes. Differential gene expression analysis and WGCNA were employed to delineate the characteristic gene sets of the two clusters. Subsequently, a diagnostic model was constructed from the identified gene sets using linear regression methodologies. The model's C index, comprising genes PNPLA3, CUX2, PLIN2, and HMGCR, achieved a remarkable value of 0.9683, with an area under the curve (AUC) for the training cohort's nomogram of 0.9376. Clinical characteristics from our dataset (n = 46) were assessed by three seasoned dermatologists, forming the NR validation cohort (NR, n = 18; non-neurogenic rosacea, n = 28). Upon application of our model to NR diagnosis, the model's AUC value reached 0.9023. Finally, potential therapeutic candidates for both patient groups were predicted via the Connectivity Map. In summation, this study unveiled two clusters with unique molecular phenotypes within rosacea, leading to the development of a precise diagnostic model instrumental in NR diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.