Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272051›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

'All for the well-being of the infant': nurses' perceptions of preterm infants' eye examinations: a phenomenographic study.

Martina Carlsen Misic, Emma Olsson, Randi Dovland Andersen, Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martina Carlsen MisicDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. martina.carlsen.misic@oru.se.
Emma OlssonDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Randi Dovland AndersenResearch Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Agneta Anderzén-CarlssonUniversity Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm infants are at risk of complications due to their prematurity and Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is one of them. To discover and treat ROP the preterm infants regularly undergo eye examinations. Nurses are responsible for the infants' care during this painful and stressful procedure.

aimThe aim of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions of preterm infants' eye examinations.

methodsData were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 nurses experienced in participating in preterm infants' eye examinations. Data were analysed using a phenomenographic approach.

resultsThe results showed several perceptions of the eye examinations, and the analysis resulted in four descriptive categories: Infants are affected by the eye examination; Nurses have comprehensive overall responsibility for the infants; Parents are important to their infants, but they need support to fulfil their parental role, and Collaboration is important for the examination's favourable outcome. The category Nurses have comprehensive overall responsibility for the infants was regarded as the most comprehensive, covering all the other categories.

conclusionsNurses felt a great responsibility during a painful and stressful procedure for preterm infants. Infants' well-being could be better protected by interprofessional collaboration, improved nursing care and involved parents.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInfant, PrematureRetinopathy of PrematurityAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleNeonatal NursingNurse's RoleParentsPhysical ExaminationQualitative ResearchNeonatalNICUNursingPrematurePretermROP screening

Identifiers

PMID39272051
PMCPMC11395982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.