Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272037›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Interpretable mortality prediction model for ICU patients with pneumonia: using shapley additive explanation method.

Jiaxi Li, Yu Zhang, ShengYang He, Yan Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaxi Li *Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Jinniu Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Yu Zhang *Information Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
ShengYang HeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Jinniu Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Yan TangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Jinniu Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China. 327194072@qq.com.

Funding

Chengdu Medical Research Project 2023195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, often necessitates Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Accurate prediction of pneumonia mortality is crucial for tailored prevention and treatment plans. However, existing mortality prediction models face limited adoption in clinical practice due to their lack of interpretability.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop an interpretable model for predicting pneumonia mortality in ICUs. Leveraging the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method, we sought to elucidate the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model and identify prognostic factors for pneumonia.

methodsConducted as a retrospective cohort study, we utilized electronic health records from the eICU-CRD (2014-2015) for all adult pneumonia patients. The first 24 h of each ICU admission records were considered, with 70% of the dataset allocated for model training and 30% for validation. The XGBoost model was employed, and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SHAP method provided insights into the XGBoost model.

resultsAmong 10,962 pneumonia patients, in-hospital mortality was 16.33%. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUC: 0.778 ± 0.016)) compared to traditional scoring systems and other machine learning method, which achieved an improvement of 10% points. SHAP analysis identified Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) as the most crucial predictor.

conclusionsInterpretable predictive models enhance mortality risk assessment for pneumonia patients in the ICU, fostering transparency. AST emerged as the foremost predictor, followed by patient age, albumin, BMI et al. These insights, rooted in strong correlations with mortality, facilitate improved clinical decision-making and resource allocation.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsPneumoniaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveICUInterpretable modelMachine learningPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID39272037
PMCPMC11395639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.