Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272029›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Predicting invasion in early-stage ground-glass opacity pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.

Junjie Bin, Mei Wu, Meiyun Huang, Yuguang Liao, Yuli Yang, Xianqiong Shi, Siqi Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junjie Bin *Department of Radiology, The Affilitated Huizhou Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Huizhou, Guangdong, China. 173043256@qq.com.
Mei Wu *Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Meiyun HuangThe First Clinical School of Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Yuguang LiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Affilitated Huizhou Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuli YangDepartment of Radiology, The Affilitated Huizhou Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Xianqiong ShiDepartment of Radiology, The Affilitated Huizhou Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Siqi TaoThe First Clinical School of Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.

Funding

Huizhou Science and Technology Bureau 221014156941115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo design a pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGN) classification method based on computed tomography (CT) radiomics and machine learning for prediction of invasion in early-stage ground-glass opacity (GGO) pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

methodsThis retrospective study included pulmonary GGN patients who were histologically confirmed to have adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma cancer (IAC) from 2020 to 2023. CT images of all patients were automatically segmented and 107 radiomic features were obtained for each patient. Classification models were developed using random forest (RF) and cross-validation, including three one-versus-others models and one three-class model. For each model, features were ranked by normalized Gini importance, and a minimal subset was selected with a cumulative importance exceeding 0.9. These selected features were then used to train the final models. The models' performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, were computed. AUC and accuracy were compared to determine the final optimal method.

resultsThe study comprised 193 patients (mean age 54 ± 11 years, 65 men), including 65 AIS, 54 MIA, and 74 IAC, divided into one training cohort (N = 154) and one test cohort (N = 39). The final three-class RF model outperformed three individual one-versus-others models in distinguishing each class from the other two. For the multiclass classification model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.87, 0.79, 0.62, and 0.88 for AIS; 0.90, 0.79, 0.54, and 0.89 for MIA; and 0.87, 0.69, 0.73, and 0.67 for IAC, respectively.

conclusionsA radiomics-based multiclass RF model could effectively differentiate three types of pulmonary GGN, which enabled early diagnosis of GGO pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityComputed tomographyGround-glass modulesLung adenocarcinomaMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39272029
PMCPMC11396739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.