Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272018›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2024

Redirection of low-acuity emergency department patients to nearby medical clinics using an electronic medical support system: effects on emergency department performance indicators.

Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens, Isabelle Gaboury, Clément Carbonnier, Mylaine Breton

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Operational Impact of Redirection From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Matched Cross-Sectional Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne-Laure Feral-PierssensCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Longueuil, Québec, Canada. Anne-laure.feral-pierssens@aphp.fr.
Isabelle GabouryCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Longueuil, Québec, Canada.
Clément CarbonnierLED, Université Paris 8 Vincennes - Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis, France.
Mylaine BretonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Longueuil, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvercrowded emergency departments (EDs) are associated with higher morbidity and mortality and suboptimal quality-of-care. Most ED flow management strategies focus on early identification and redirection of low-acuity patients to primary care settings. To assess the impact of redirecting low-acuity ED patients to medical clinics using an electronic clinical decision support system on four ED performance indicators.

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study in the ED of a Canadian tertiary trauma center where a redirection process for low-acuity patients was implemented. The process was based on a clinical decision support system relying on an algorithm based on chief complaint, performed by nurses at triage and not involving physician assessment. All patients visiting the ED from 2013 to 2017 were included. We compared ED performance indicators before and after implementation of the redirection process (June 2015): length-of-triage, time-to-initial-physician-assessment, length-of-stay and rate of patients leaving without being seen. We performed an interrupted time series analysis adjusted for age, gender, time of visit, triage category and overcrowding.

resultsOf 242,972 ED attendees over the study period, 9546 (8% of 121,116 post-intervention patients) were redirected to a nearby primary medical clinic. After the redirection process was implemented, length-of-triage increased by 1 min [1;2], time-to-initial assessment decreased by 13 min [-16;-11], length-of-stay for non-redirected patients increased by 29 min [13;44] (p < 0.001), minus 20 min [-42;1] (p = 0.066) for patients assigned to triage 5 category. The rate of patients leaving without being seen decreased by 2% [-3;-2] (p < 0.001).

conclusionImplementing a redirection process for low-acuity ED patients based on a clinical support system was associated with improvements in two of four ED performance indicators.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageAdultAgedCanadaCrowdingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient AcuityQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective StudiesAssessment of healthcare needEmergency health serviceHealthcare systemTriage

Identifiers

PMID39272018
PMCPMC11401375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.